2010 Kimball, Tirey and St. John LLP
Property Co-Ownership Disputes
Jamie Sternberg, Esq.

June, 2010

When property is owned by more than one owner, and the owners disagree, how is the parties’ dispute resolved?

Disputes between co-owners may involve any of the following issues (or others):
• One owner has sole possession of the property but refuses to pay rent or otherwise compensate the owner who is not in possession;
• One owner refuses to pay his or her share of the property expenses;
• The owners disagree regarding management issues; or
• The co-owners can’t agree about how to handle the property in the future (e.g. whether to continue to hold it for investment or to sell it, or whether the property should be improved).

If the parties formalized their agreement regarding the property when they bought it (whether in the form of an LLC’s operating agreement, a partnership agreement, a tenancy in common agreement, a corporate buy-sell agreement, or other agreement), the parties can look to their agreement, and California law, to determine their rights and obligations to one another .

In the absence of an agreement to the contrary:
• Co-owners have equal rights to possession of the property, and equal rights and responsibilities. If one co-owner excludes the other from the property, the excluded co-owner can recover the property’s rental value from the excluding co-owner.
• If one owner can’t or won’t pay property expenses, the other owner may be forced to pay the property expenses to preserve the investment. A co-owner who pays more than his share of operating and maintenance expenses is entitled to reimbursement from the other co-owner. However, a co-owner who has paid to improve the property is not entitled to reimbursement.
• If the parties cannot resolve their dispute (either directly, with the assistance of attorneys or others or through a form of alternative dispute resolution), the parties can apply to a court to determine the parties’ rights and obligations. In a co-ownership situation, this is done through a partition action .

A partition action is a lawsuit in which a co-owner requests that the court divide the property or its sale proceeds. There are two different types of division:
• Physically dividing the property between the co-owners; or
• Ordering the property sold (either by private sale or public auction) and the proceeds split between the co-owners.

Partition action costs (such as filing fees, referees fees, surveyor fees, and title policies) will be allocated between the parties by the court. The costs are usually allocated in proportion to the ownership interests, but a judge may order differently if the judge feels that a different allocation is more equitable. The court will also allocate attorney’s fees incurred by the parties.

Partition actions are usually time consuming, emotionally draining and expensive for both owners. The threat of a partition action should cause both owners to carefully consider alternatives. Partition actions should be filed only when discussions and/or mediation cannot resolve the disagreement.

Co-ownership disputes may be settled through one owner buying the other out, or an agreement to sell the property. A knowledgeable attorney can advise about the advantages and disadvantages of partition actions and other options available to feuding co-owners.

Kimball, Tirey & St. John LLP specializes in landlord/tenant, collections, business and real estate law, with offices throughout California. This article is informational only and should not be used as legal advice. Check with your attorney before acting. If you have any questions regarding this article, please call 1-800-574-5587.

Kimball, Tirey & St. John LLP is a law firm that specializes in landlord/tenant, collections, fair housing and business and real estate, with offices throughout California. Property owner's and manager's with questions regarding the contents of this article, please call 800.338.6039.
© 2010 Kimball, Tirey and St. John LLP